BrazzilMag

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Custom Search

Who's Online

We have 308 guests online

Statistics

Members : 4164
Content : 13000
Content View Hits : 77746357

Search BrazzilMag

Brazil Tumbles 41 Points to 99th Place in Press Freedom While US Drops to 47th PDF Print E-mail
2012 - January 2012
Written by Newsroom   
Thursday, 26 January 2012 02:37

Freedom of press The international freedom of press organization Reporters Without Borders has placed Brazil in the 99th position in the 2011/2012 ranking of press freedom, which evaluates the working conditions of journalists in 179 countries. This was a drop of 41 places when compared to the previous report in 2010. 

According to the organization, Brazil was the Latin American country with the biggest fall. It was mentioned the hight level of violence against journalists particularly in the North and Northeast.
 
Reporters mention that three journalists were murdered last year in Brazil but does not name them.
 
Last year, Reporters Without Borders issued notes denouncing the death of at least four Brazilian journalists - Valério Nascimento, Luciano Leitão Pedrosa, Ednaldo Figueira and Gelson Domingos da Silva.
 
Finland, Norway and Estonia head the list as the paradise for freedom of the press, while Turkmenistan, North Korea and Eritrea appear as worst places in the world to be a journalist.
 
In Latin America, Uruguay, which came in 32th place was the best placed. Argentina (47), Chile and Paraguay (both in 80) all appeared ahead of Brazil.

The US also had a big tumble: 27 points, placing it in 47th place. This had to do with repeated crackdowns on journalists covering Occupy Wall Street movements.

Read below the report released by Reporters Without Borders:

"This year's index sees many changes in the rankings, changes that reflect a year that was incredibly rich in developments, especially in the Arab world," Reporters Without Borders wrote Wednesday as it released its 10th annual press freedom index.

"Many media paid dearly for their coverage of democratic aspirations or opposition movements. Control of news and information continued to tempt governments and to be a question of survival for totalitarian and repressive regimes. The past year also highlighted the leading role played by netizens in producing and disseminating news.

"Crackdown was the word of the year in 2011. Never has freedom of information been so closely associated with democracy. Never have journalists, through their reporting, vexed the enemies of freedom so much.

"Never have acts of censorship and physical attacks on journalists seemed so numerous. The equation is simple: the absence or suppression of civil liberties leads necessarily to the suppression of media freedom. Dictatorships fear and ban information, especially when it may undermine them.

"It is no surprise that the same trio of countries, Eritrea, Turkmenistan and North Korea, absolute dictatorships that permit no civil liberties, again occupy the last three places in the index. This year, they are immediately preceded at the bottom by Syria, Iran and China, three countries that seem to have lost contact with reality as they have been sucked into an insane spiral of terror, and by Bahrain and Vietnam, quintessential oppressive regimes. Other countries such as Uganda and Belarus have also become much more repressive.

"This year's index finds the same group of countries at its head, countries such as Finland, Norway and Netherlands that respect basic freedoms. This serves as a reminder that media independence can only be maintained in strong democracies and that democracy needs media freedom. It is worth noting the entry of Cape Verde and Namibia into the top twenty, two African countries where no attempts to obstruct the media were reported in 2011."

Protest Movements

The Arab world was the motor of history in 2011 but the Arab uprisings have had contrasting political outcomes so far, with Tunisia and Bahrain at opposite ends of the scale. Tunisia (134th) rose 30 places in index and, with much suffering, gave birth to a democratic regime that has not yet fully accepted a free and independent press.

Bahrain (173rd) fell 29 places because of its relentless crackdown on pro-democracy movements, its trials of human rights defenders and its suppression of all space for freedom.

While Libya (154th) turned the page on the Gaddafi era, Yemen succumbed to violence between President Ali Abdallah Saleh's opponents and supporters and languished in 171st position. The future of both of these countries remains uncertain, and the place they will allow the media is undecided.

The same goes for Egypt, which fell 39 places to 166th because the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, in power since February, dashed the hopes of democrats by continuing the Mubarak dictatorship's practices. There were three periods of exceptional violence for journalists: in February, November and December.

Already poorly ranked in 2010, Syria fell further in the index, to 176th position, because total censorship, widespread surveillance, indiscriminate violence and government manipulation made it impossible for journalists to work.

Elsewhere in the world, pro-democracy movements that tried to follow the Arab example were ruthlessly suppressed. Many arrests were made in Vietnam (172nd). In China (174th), the government responded to regional and local protests and to public impatience with scandals and acts of injustice by feverishly reinforcing its system of controlling news and information, carrying out extrajudicial arrests and stepping up Internet censorship.

There was a dramatic rise in the number of arrests in Azerbaijan (162nd), where Ilham Aliyev's autocratic government did not hesitate to jail netizens, abduct opposition journalists and bar foreign reporters in order to impose a news blackout on the unrest.

Led by President Yoweri Museveni, Uganda (139th) launched an unprecedented crackdown on opposition movements and independent media after the elections in February. Similarly, Chile (80th) fell 47 places because of its many freedom of information violations, committed very often by the security forces during student protests. The United States (47th) also owed its fall of 27 places to the many arrests of journalist covering Occupy Wall Street protests.

The index has highlighted the divergence of some European countries from the rest of the continent. The crackdown on protests after President Lukashenko's reelection caused Belarus to fall 14 places to 168th.

At a time when it is portraying itself as a regional model, Turkey (148th) took a big step backwards and lost 10 places. Far from carrying out promised reforms, the judicial system launched a wave of arrests of journalists that was without precedent since the military dictatorship.

Within the European Union, the index reflects a continuation of the very marked distinction between countries such as Finland and Netherlands that have always had a good evaluation and countries such as Bulgaria (80th), Greece (70th) and Italy (61st) that fail to address the issue of their media freedom violations, above all because of a lack of political will.

There was little progress from France, which went from 44th to 38th, or from Spain (39th) and Romania (47th). Media freedom is a challenge that needs addressing more than ever in the Balkans, which want to join the European Union but are suffering the negative effects of the economic crisis.

Endemic Violence

Many countries are marked by a culture of violence towards the media that has taken a deep hold. It will be hard to reverse the trends in these countries without an effective fight against impunity. Mexico (149th) and Honduras (135th) are two cases in point.

Pakistan (151st) was the world's deadliest country for journalists for the second year running. Somalia (164th), which has been at war for 20 years, shows no sign of finding a way out of the chaos in which journalists are paying a heavy price.

In Iran (175th), hounding and humiliating journalists has been part of officialdom's political culture for years. The regime feeds on persecution of the media. Iraq (152nd) fell back 22 places and is now worryingly approaching its 2008 position (158th).

South Sudan, a new nation facing many challenges, has entered the index in a respectable position (111th) for what is a breakaway from one of the worst ranked countries, Sudan (170th). Burma (169th) has a slightly better position than in previous years as a result of political changes in recent months that have raised hopes but need to be confirmed. Niger (29th) achieved the biggest rise in a single year, 75 places, thanks to a successful political transition.

It was Africa that also saw the biggest falls in the index. Djibouti, a discreet little dictatorship in the Horn of Africa, fell 49 places to 159th. Malawi (146th) fell 67 places because of the totalitarian tendencies of its president, Bingu Wa Mutharika. Uganda, mentioned above, fell 43 places to 139th. Finally, Côte d'Ivoire fell 41 places to 159th because the media were badly hit by the fighting between the supporters of rival presidents Laurent Gbagbo and Alassane Ouattara.

Comments (4)Add Comment
More publicity of facts
written by Pete, January 26, 2012
It is too bad that this type of info is not more readily availibe to the public. As a US Citizen I always think we have a lot of "free press" and that it has the right to tell it like it is...I understand security issues being held back to keep us safe, but general info like the Occupy stuff is a little shocking. Though I may not agree with it, there are things I like that they may not like. That is what makes the U.S. what it is. Freedom of speech and press.

I have found other facts like this article that I had to really search hard for or just happened to stumble onto while using internet searches. These type of things bring us into perspective of what it going on. After all, the press is the only way we can get the news, without too much slant to it.
journalists were murdered last year in Brazil
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, January 26, 2012

What the article does not say is that the journalists that were killed in Brazil last year, were killed because of their articles related to the criminal gangs and their illegal drug activities in Brazil.

.
Reply to Pete
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, January 26, 2012

It is not a matter of having a "free press" in Brazil.

It's a matter of the criminals killing the journalists who try to expose the activities of the criminal gangs in Brazil.

.
Oh, but it is, it is
written by Jonathan Quimbly, February 03, 2012
In Brazil, you're a journalist only if the government allows you to be. Just carrying a notepad or camera into the street doesn't entitle you to anything, as it partially does in the USA and other countries.

I would also that a country, whose cities are so out of control with gang activity, which cannot protect its journalists from revenge killings does indeed warrant a lower press freedom ranking.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack
Digital Point Advertising | Advertising Auction | Advertising | Digital Point Ads | Digital Point Advertising